site stats

Elliff v texon drilling co

WebJun 8, 2012 · See Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co. 146 Tex. 575, 210 S.W.2d 558, 562 (1948) (“[O]ur courts, in decisions involving well-spacing regulations of our Railroad Commission, have frequently announced the sound view that each landowner should be afforded the opportunity to produce his fair share of the recoverable oil and gas beneath his land ... WebElliff v Texon Drilling Co. Well blew out - Rule of Law: The negligent waste and destruction of a person's gas and oil will permit that person to recover damages because he has been deprived of his rights in that property. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v Garza No subsurface trespass from fracking, due to the rule of capture no damages owed.

Property Law Cases Flashcards Quizlet

WebOct 14, 2024 · Historically, there is precedent for damages for destruction of a neighboring well. In Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co., a well operated by Texon blew out and the resulting fallout destroyed a well on the adjacent property. The Texas Supreme Court found that Texon acted negligently and awarded damages. WebTexon Drilling Co. (Tex. 1948), Hague v. Wheeler (1893), United States Steel Corp. v. Hoge (1983) and more. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Elliff v. how to check naukri subscription https://rixtravel.com

Community - lexisnexis.com

WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co. Case Brief for Law School LexisNexis Law School Case Brief Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co. - 146 Tex. 575, 210 S.W.2d 558 (1948) Rule: Under the law … WebELLIFF et al. v. TEXON DRILLING CO. et al. No. A-1401. March 3, 1948. Rehearing Denied May 12, 1948. Error to the Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Su-preme Judicial … WebTexon Drilling Co. a. Elliff brought suit for Texon negligence; owned land; drilled diagonally; well blew and caught fire; destroyed lots of Elliff’s land i. Rule of capture does not insulate adjacent landowner for damages from the wrongful capture of gas and distillate from beneath the land of another 1. how to check navel displacement

Property Law Cases Flashcards Quizlet

Category:Elliff v. Texon Drilling. Co. - Casetext

Tags:Elliff v texon drilling co

Elliff v texon drilling co

Oil and Gas Law - Cases Flashcards Quizlet

Web2.Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co., 210 S.W.2d 558, 561-62 (Tex. 1948). 2015] WHAT THE FRACK? 323! the land—as developers drilled more wells than were necessary to effectively and efficiently drain a reservoir. For many years, the industry employed a single model. Under this “standard model,” a developer drills a single well ... WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co. 210 S.W.2d 558: Supreme Court of Texas, 1948: Download: 99: Tapscott v. Lessee of Cobbs: 52 Va. (11 Gratt.) 172: Supreme Court of Virginia, 1854: Download: 111: ... a company's property interest in its product is valid only for the products it creates. "Others may imitate these at their pleasure." Upton v. JWP ...

Elliff v texon drilling co

Did you know?

WebJul 25, 2010 · Texon Drilling Co. In that 1948 case, the Elliff family of Nueces County successfully argued that a blowout of a Texon well on nearby acreage wrongfully caused oil and gas to drain out... WebSee Texon Drilling Co. v. Elliff, Tex. Civ. App. 210 S.W.2d 553. The Supreme Court held that the appellants' actions resulted in waste and a wrongful dissipation of the gas and …

WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co - Rule of capture: basically all of the oil and gas in the ground is free reign and once you have mined it out it is yours - BUT in this case, Texon drilling was NEGLIGENT and wasted a ton of gas so they cannot claim right to the escaped oil and gas under rule of capture WebTexon Drilling Co. 146 tex. 575, 210 s.w.2d 558 (1948) The landowners owned the surface and certain royalty interest of land upon which a producing well was located, as well as …

WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co., 1948, 146 Tex. 575, 210 S.W.2d 558, 4 A.L.R.2d 191. That opinion says that the gas is subject to regulation and to legitimate drainage under the law of capture, but that the owner 'is accorded the usual remedies against trespassers who appropriate the minerals or destroy their market value.' Moreover, the same ... Web— Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co. Mauris finibus odio eu maximus interdum. Ut ultricies suscipit justo in bibendum. Sed eu magna efficitur, luctus lorem ut, tincidunt arcu. Praesent varius sit amet erat hendrerit placerat. In posuere eget ante id facilisis. Integer semper venenatis felis lacinia malesuada.

WebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co. Case Brief for Law School LexisNexis Law School Case Brief Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co. - 146 Tex. 575, 210 S.W.2d 558 (1948) Rule: Under the law …

WebTexas Supreme Court. Docket Number: No. A-1401. This is a suit by the petitioners, Mrs. Mabel Elliff, Frank Elliff, and Charles C. Elliff, against the respondents, Texon Drilling … how to check navy federal account numberWebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co. Supreme Court of Texas, 1948 210 S.W.2d 558 Listen to the opinion: Tweet Brief Fact Summary Blow out of wells caused waste of oil and gas and … how to check navodaya result 2022 class 6WebTEXON DRILLING CO. et al. v. ELLIFF et al. No. 11681. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio. June 4, 1947. Rehearing Denied July 9, 1947. Appeal from District Court, … how to check navy email from homeWebElliff v. Texon Drilling Co. Occupancy vs. Title Johnson v. M’Intosh Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. US Unjust Enrichment vs. Forced Sale Somerville v. Jacobs Doctrine of Misappropriation International News Service v. Associated Press Law of Capture Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co. Pierson v. Post Friendswood Right to Publicity π, MLK Center for Social ... how to check navy email at homeWebThe rule of capture has been defined by the Texas Supreme Court in Elliff v. Texon Drilling Co., 210 S.W.2d 558 (Tex., 1948) as follows: The owner of a tract of land acquires title to the oil or gas which he. produces from wells on his land, even though part of the oil or gas may have migrated from adjoining lands. how to check navodaya result 2021 class 6WebTexon Drilling Co.,[10] which involved an oil well that malfunctioned and damaged a neighboring extraction operation. The defendant negligently permitted one of its wells to blow out and burn, which caused large quantities of oil from the plaintiff’s property to drain. how to check nbi clearance statusWebTexon Drilling Co. v. Elliff Case Brief for Law School LexisNexis Law School Case Brief Texon Drilling Co. v. Elliff - 210 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Civ. App. 1947) Rule: The rule in … how to check navodaya result